-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
DATAJPA-1652: Using || (pipes) along with named parameters in custom queries raises an exception #405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
DATAJPA-1652: Using || (pipes) along with named parameters in custom queries raises an exception #405
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This adds a the
|
to the list of separators for an identifiers.But the underlying problem lies deeper: the Unicode punctuation (
\p{P}
)category doesn't contain many of the values in the Posix punctuation category (\{Punct}
). For example<
and>
aren't in that list either.I quickly tried
\{Punct}
but breaks some other test.In any case we need a solution addressing the general problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback @schauder , I have refactored the implementation a bit to address the issue at large, wondering what do you think, all tests are passing. Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this fixes the problem at hand while not breaking any tests it just makes it obvious that something is really wrong here: an Identifier shouldn't contain a
#
and also probably not a$
.It seems
IDENTIFIER
isn't used for matching identifier, but something like identifier-or-spelTherefore it
a) should be named as such
b) should be constructed as such, i.e. out of two regex that matches identifiers and spels respectively.
c) all the usages should be verified that they actually should use the more general regex vs the one that actually matches identifiers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the
$
seems to be a valid symbol within identifier name, there is even a dedicated test for it:The
#
indeed is the SpelEx delimiter, in this context it turned out to be correct but redundant: it is explicitly included withinNAMED_PARAMETER
pattern. So I removed it from the more strictIDENTIFIER
match.