Remove branching overhead in BytecodeUtil by replacing if with else if
#3168
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@mitu2 Please sign the Contributor License Agreement! Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request. See the FAQ for frequently asked questions. |
spring-projects-issues
added
the
status: waiting-for-triage
|
@mitu2 Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement! |
mp911de
added
type: task
mp911de
changed the title
if to else ifBytecodeUtil by replacing if with else if
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2025
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2025
|
Thank you for your contribution. That's merged, polished, and backported now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This method does not return in time after an internal match succeeds, resulting in code overhead.
If there is anything wrong with the first PR, please point it out