Skip to content

Introduce argument resolver for OffsetScrollPosition #2861

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Jun 16, 2023

See GH-2856

@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Jun 17, 2023

Should the class names OffsetScrollPosition* be simplified as Offset*?

@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jul 4, 2023

Should the class names OffsetScrollPosition* be simplified as Offset*?

It is fine to have fully-qualified class names as we want to be explicit about the type of arguments we want to resolve.

@mp911de mp911de changed the title Implement argument resolver for OffsetScrollPosition Introduce argument resolver for OffsetScrollPosition Jul 4, 2023
@mp911de mp911de linked an issue Jul 4, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.2 M1 (2023.1.0) milestone Jul 4, 2023
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jul 4, 2023

Thank you for your contribution. That's merged and polished now.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Jul 4, 2023
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
Allow nullable OffsetScrollPosition and add support for values wrapped within Optional.

Update tests. Reformat code. Add issue tags to tests.

See #2856
Original pull request: #2861
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Introduce argument resolver for OffsetScrollPosition
3 participants