Skip to content

Polish #43879

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Polish #43879

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

izeye
Copy link
Contributor

@izeye izeye commented Jan 19, 2025

This PR polishes a bit.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jan 19, 2025
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 20, 2025
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.5.x milestone Jan 20, 2025
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ You can also add javadoc:org.springframework.test.context.DynamicPropertySource[

When using devtools, you can annotate beans and bean methods with javadoc:org.springframework.boot.devtools.restart.RestartScope[format=annotation].
Such beans won't be recreated when the devtools restart the application.
This is especially useful for Testcontainer javadoc:org.testcontainers.containers.Container[] beans, as they keep their state despite the application restart.
This is especially useful for Testcontainers javadoc:org.testcontainers.containers.Container[] beans, as they keep their state despite the application restart.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was intentionally singular. If it's to change, I think it should be changed to "container".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wilkinsona How about "Testcontainers'" or just removing "Testcontainer"?

"container Container beans" doesn't sound right to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops. Yeah, I think we can just remove it as we're already in a section about Testcontainers. I think "for Container beans" reads better and there's enough context to know that it's a Testcontainers container.

@@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@
},
{
"name": "management.metrics.graphql.autotime.enabled",
"description": "Whether to automatically time web client requests.",
"description": "Whether to automatically time GraphQL requests.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've opened #43901 for this as I think it warrants a separate issue that'll appear in the changelog.

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ class FilteringStatusListener extends ContextAwareBase implements StatusListener

/**
* Creates a new {@link FilteringStatusListener}.
* @param delegate the {@link StatusListener} delegate to
* @param delegate the {@link StatusListener} to delegate
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be "to delegate to".

izeye added 2 commits January 21, 2025 23:46
Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
@izeye
Copy link
Contributor Author

izeye commented Jan 21, 2025

@wilkinsona Thanks for the feedback!

I applied your suggestions in cbb44e1.

@izeye
Copy link
Contributor Author

izeye commented Jan 23, 2025

Sorry, I forgot to revert the change on the description of the management.metrics.graphql.autotime.enabled property. I've done it in cadf0e0.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.5.x, 3.3.x Jan 24, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
This was referenced Jan 24, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.3.9 Jan 24, 2025
wilkinsona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
See gh-43879

Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Thanks very much, @izeye!

@izeye izeye deleted the polish-20250119 branch January 24, 2025 09:02
arefbehboudi pushed a commit to arefbehboudi/spring-boot that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
See spring-projectsgh-43879

Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: arefbehboudi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants