Skip to content

Only pack requirements for Python runtimes #204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Only pack requirements for Python runtimes #204

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sbonami
Copy link

@sbonami sbonami commented Jun 15, 2018

No description provided.

@@ -376,6 +376,56 @@ teardown() {
! ls puck2/pyaml
}

@test "py2.7 can package module requirements with zip option" {
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dschep Is it expected functionality for the zip flag not to move up the root module?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so. That seems to be the cause of #203

Copy link

@felipe-augusto felipe-augusto Jun 18, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I managed to fix this problem, by doing this: felipe-augusto@2a14d92

But I don't know if this is the desired behavior.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dschep I believe so as well.

To anyone: Feel free to cherry-pick or modify the regression tests from 6f7b229 and a20a209 to validate the fix. I believe a fix to that issue precedes my addition.

@sbonami sbonami closed this Aug 23, 2018
@sbonami sbonami deleted the Only-Pack-Requirements-for-functions-with-Python-runtime branch August 23, 2018 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants