We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following examples are not highlighted correctly:
1e12 1e+34 1e-56 1e12f 1e+34f 1e-56f 1e12d 1e+34d 1e-56d 1E12 1E+34 1E-56 1E12f 1E+34f 1E-56f 1E12d 1E+34d 1E-56d .1e12 .1e+34 .1e-56 .1e12f .1e+34f .1e-56f .1e12d .1e+34d .1e-56d .1E12 .1E+34 .1E-56 .1E12f .1E+34f .1E-56f .1E12d .1E+34d .1E-56d
I would expect them to be entirely orange, and not white + orange + blue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix scala#105: Detect all combinations of dot in numberic literals
96db83f
af1e15d
Merge pull request #106 from nicolasstucki/fix-#105
f3fea07
Fix #105: Detect all combinations of dot in numeric literals
No branches or pull requests
The following examples are not highlighted correctly:
I would expect them to be entirely orange, and not white + orange + blue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: