Skip to content

Fix #7965: Deal with AndTypes in joins #7992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 15, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 16 additions & 1 deletion compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/TypeComparer.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ class TypeComparer(initctx: Context) extends ConstraintHandling[AbsentContext] w
if (tp11.stripTypeVar eq tp12.stripTypeVar) recur(tp11, tp2)
else thirdTry
case tp1 @ OrType(tp11, tp12) =>

def joinOK = tp2.dealiasKeepRefiningAnnots match {
case tp2: AppliedType if !tp2.tycon.typeSymbol.isClass =>
// If we apply the default algorithm for `A[X] | B[Y] <: C[Z]` where `C` is a
Expand All @@ -427,6 +428,12 @@ class TypeComparer(initctx: Context) extends ConstraintHandling[AbsentContext] w
case _ =>
false
}

def containsAnd(tp: Type): Boolean = tp.dealiasKeepRefiningAnnots match
case tp: AndType => true
case OrType(tp1, tp2) => containsAnd(tp1) || containsAnd(tp2)
case _ => false

def widenOK =
(tp2.widenSingletons eq tp2) &&
(tp1.widenSingletons ne tp1) &&
Expand All @@ -435,7 +442,15 @@ class TypeComparer(initctx: Context) extends ConstraintHandling[AbsentContext] w
if (tp2.atoms.nonEmpty && canCompare(tp2.atoms))
tp1.atoms.nonEmpty && tp1.atoms.subsetOf(tp2.atoms)
else
widenOK || joinOK || recur(tp11, tp2) && recur(tp12, tp2)
widenOK
|| joinOK
|| recur(tp11, tp2) && recur(tp12, tp2)
|| containsAnd(tp1) && recur(tp1.join, tp2)
// An & on the left side loses information. Compensate by also trying the join.
// This is less ad-hoc than it looks since we produce joins in type inference,
// and then need to check that they are indeed supertypes of the original types
// under -Ycheck. Test case is i7965.scala.

case tp1: MatchType =>
val reduced = tp1.reduced
if (reduced.exists) recur(reduced, tp2) else thirdTry
Expand Down
11 changes: 9 additions & 2 deletions compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/TypeOps.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -198,28 +198,35 @@ trait TypeOps { this: Context => // TODO: Make standalone object.

def mergeRefinedOrApplied(tp1: Type, tp2: Type): Type = {
def fail = throw new AssertionError(i"Failure to join alternatives $tp1 and $tp2")
def fallback = tp2 match
case AndType(tp21, tp22) =>
mergeRefinedOrApplied(tp1, tp21) & mergeRefinedOrApplied(tp1, tp22)
case _ =>
fail
tp1 match {
case tp1 @ RefinedType(parent1, name1, rinfo1) =>
tp2 match {
case RefinedType(parent2, `name1`, rinfo2) =>
tp1.derivedRefinedType(
mergeRefinedOrApplied(parent1, parent2), name1, rinfo1 | rinfo2)
case _ => fail
case _ => fallback
}
case tp1 @ AppliedType(tycon1, args1) =>
tp2 match {
case AppliedType(tycon2, args2) =>
tp1.derivedAppliedType(
mergeRefinedOrApplied(tycon1, tycon2),
ctx.typeComparer.lubArgs(args1, args2, tycon1.typeParams))
case _ => fail
case _ => fallback
}
case tp1 @ TypeRef(pre1, _) =>
tp2 match {
case tp2 @ TypeRef(pre2, _) if tp1.name eq tp2.name =>
tp1.derivedSelect(pre1 | pre2)
case _ => fail
Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter Jan 15, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fallback is also necessary here, otherwise the following would crash:

class Outer {
  class Elem
}

class Test {
  val o1: Outer = ???
  val o2: Outer = ???
  val o3: Outer = ???

  val x: o1.Elem | (o2.Elem & o3.Elem)
  def foo[T <: Outer#Elem](has: T): T = ???
  foo(x)
}

}
case AndType(tp11, tp12) =>
mergeRefinedOrApplied(tp11, tp2) & mergeRefinedOrApplied(tp12, tp2)
case _ => fail
}
}
Expand Down
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions tests/pos/i7965.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
class Has[A]
trait X
trait Y
trait Z

abstract class Test {
def x: Has[X] | (Has[Y] & Has[Z])
val y: Has[? >: (X & Y) | (X & Z) <: (X | Y) & (X | Z)] = x

def foo[T <: Has[_]](has: T): T = has
foo(x)
}

trait ZLayer[-RIn, +E, +ROut <: Has[_]] {
def >>>[E1 >: E, ROut2 <: Has[_]](that: ZLayer[ROut, E1, ROut2]): ZLayer[RIn, E1, ROut2]
def ++[E1 >: E, RIn2, ROut1 >: ROut <: Has[_], ROut2 <: Has[_]](that: ZLayer[RIn2, E1, ROut2]): ZLayer[RIn with RIn2, E1, ROut1 with ROut2]
}
object ZLayer {
type NoDeps[+E, +B <: Has[_]] = ZLayer[Any, E, B]
}

type ServiceA = Has[ServiceA.Service]
object ServiceA {
trait Service
val live: ZLayer.NoDeps[Nothing, ServiceA] = ???
}

type ServiceB = Has[ServiceB.Service]
object ServiceB {
trait Service
val live: ZLayer.NoDeps[Nothing, ServiceB] = ???
}

type ServiceC = Has[ServiceC.Service]
object ServiceC {
trait Service
val live: ZLayer.NoDeps[Nothing, ServiceC] = ???
}

type ServiceD = Has[ServiceD.Service]
object ServiceD {
trait Service
val live: ZLayer.NoDeps[ServiceC, ServiceD with ServiceC] = ???
}

val combined =
ServiceA.live >>>
(ServiceB.live ++ (ServiceC.live >>> ServiceD.live))