Skip to content

Fix #7739: Handle private toplevel vars. #7768

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2019

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Dec 15, 2019

These get a setter even though they are declared private, since
the private is implicitly widened to private[<enclosing package>].

Copy link
Member

@dottybot dottybot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉

All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️

Commit Messages

We want to keep history, but for that to actually be useful we have
some rules on how to format our commit messages (relevant xkcd).

Please stick to these guidelines for commit messages:

  1. Separate subject from body with a blank line
  2. When fixing an issue, start your commit message with Fix #<ISSUE-NBR>:
  3. Limit the subject line to 72 characters
  4. Capitalize the subject line
  5. Do not end the subject line with a period
  6. Use the imperative mood in the subject line ("Add" instead of "Added")
  7. Wrap the body at 80 characters
  8. Use the body to explain what and why vs. how

adapted from https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit

Have an awesome day! ☀️

These get a setter even though they are declared private, since
the private is implicitly widened to private[<enclosing package>].
@odersky odersky changed the title Fix #7736: Handle private toplevel vars. Fix #7739: Handle private toplevel vars. Dec 15, 2019
@anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor

Why do we need to generate getters and setters for them at all? In Getters, there's a comment:

https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/b8449ae956fbfcefaa50283291f7ba3b233303f4/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/Getters.scala#L42-L46

Fields generated for static modules are omitted. How are package objects different?

@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk added this to the 0.21 Tech Preview milestone Dec 16, 2019
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk merged commit 2994dfe into scala:master Dec 17, 2019
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk deleted the fix-#7736 branch December 17, 2019 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants