Add checkTypes to support type unit testing #5245
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dottybot
reviewed
Oct 11, 2018
smarter
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2018
Implementation mostly stolen from TypeStealer.
milessabin
force-pushed
the
topic/type-tests
branch
from
c698eb1 to
d21627c
Compare
|
Squashed. Also added a variant which takes multiple lists of type strings, primarily to support lists of expected results. |
|
@smarter I've tweaked this slightly (see above) ... if you're still happy I'll merge. |
|
sure! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implementation mostly stolen from TypeStealer.
CheckTypesTestsare tests ofDottyTest#checkTypes(s)rather than of<:<.