-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix #2869: Have constructors run after group of Memoize #2870
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -30,7 +30,24 @@ class Constructors extends MiniPhaseTransform with IdentityDenotTransformer { th | |
import tpd._ | ||
|
||
override def phaseName: String = "constructors" | ||
override def runsAfter: Set[Class[_ <: Phase]] = Set(classOf[Memoize], classOf[HoistSuperArgs]) | ||
override def runsAfter: Set[Class[_ <: Phase]] = Set(classOf[HoistSuperArgs]) | ||
override def runsAfterGroupsOf: Set[Class[_ <: Phase]] = Set(classOf[Memoize]) | ||
// Memoized needs to be finished because we depend on the ownerchain after Memoize | ||
// when checking whether an ident is an access in a constructor or outside it. | ||
// This test is done in the right-hand side of a value definition. If Memoize | ||
// was in the same group as Constructors, the test on the rhs ident would be | ||
// performed before the rhs undergoes the owner change. This would lead | ||
// to more symbls being retained as parameters. Test case is | ||
// | ||
// dotc tests/pos/captuing.scala -Xprint:constr | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. typo: captuing -> capturing |
||
// | ||
// `sf` should not be retained as a filed of class `MT`. | ||
|
||
/** The private vals that are known to be retained as class fields */ | ||
private val retainedPrivateVals = mutable.Set[Symbol]() | ||
|
||
/** The private vals whose definition comes before the current focus */ | ||
private val seenPrivateVals = mutable.Set[Symbol]() | ||
|
||
// Collect all private parameter accessors and value definitions that need | ||
// to be retained. There are several reasons why a parameter accessor or | ||
|
@@ -40,14 +57,10 @@ class Constructors extends MiniPhaseTransform with IdentityDenotTransformer { th | |
// 3. It is accessed on an object other than `this` | ||
// 4. It is a mutable parameter accessor | ||
// 5. It is has a wildcard initializer `_` | ||
private val retainedPrivateVals = mutable.Set[Symbol]() | ||
private val seenPrivateVals = mutable.Set[Symbol]() | ||
|
||
private def markUsedPrivateSymbols(tree: RefTree)(implicit ctx: Context): Unit = { | ||
|
||
val sym = tree.symbol | ||
def retain() = | ||
retainedPrivateVals.add(sym) | ||
def retain() = retainedPrivateVals.add(sym) | ||
|
||
if (sym.exists && sym.owner.isClass && mightBeDropped(sym)) { | ||
val owner = sym.owner.asClass | ||
|
@@ -58,7 +71,8 @@ class Constructors extends MiniPhaseTransform with IdentityDenotTransformer { th | |
val method = ctx.owner.enclosingMethod | ||
method.isPrimaryConstructor && ctx.owner.enclosingClass == owner | ||
} | ||
if (inConstructor && (sym.is(ParamAccessor) || seenPrivateVals.contains(sym))) { | ||
if (inConstructor && | ||
(sym.is(ParamAccessor) || seenPrivateVals.contains(sym))) { | ||
// used inside constructor, accessed on this, | ||
// could use constructor argument instead, no need to retain field | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -79,8 +93,7 @@ class Constructors extends MiniPhaseTransform with IdentityDenotTransformer { th | |
} | ||
|
||
override def transformValDef(tree: tpd.ValDef)(implicit ctx: Context, info: TransformerInfo): tpd.Tree = { | ||
if (mightBeDropped(tree.symbol)) | ||
(if (isWildcardStarArg(tree.rhs)) retainedPrivateVals else seenPrivateVals) += tree.symbol | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why was this condition dropped? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It is (probably) dead code. The test looks non-sensical to me. I fail to see how a definition of a class member can end up as something like this:
Even if it did, why would it make a difference? I put in an assert to flag the condition, but it never triggered in all our tests. |
||
if (mightBeDropped(tree.symbol)) seenPrivateVals += tree.symbol | ||
tree | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
private final java.lang.String MT.s |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
class MT(sf: MT => String) { | ||
// `s` is retained as a field, but `sf` should not be. | ||
val s = sf(this) | ||
} | ||
object Test extends App { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we've deprecated/discouraged the use of There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes but I am not sure why? I hate to write all these main methods. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See #559 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I am still not sure why we use LegacyApp instead of App now. They seem to be equivalent. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. /cc @DarkDimius do you remember why LegacyApp had to be introduced? |
||
def printFields(obj: Any) = | ||
println(obj.getClass.getDeclaredFields.map(_.toString).sorted.deep.mkString("\n")) | ||
printFields(new MT(_ => "")) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo: symbls -> symbols