Skip to content

Fixes to CLI and version reporting. #2531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 26, 2017

Conversation

DarkDimius
Copy link
Contributor

We used to report a hardcoded 0.0.1 version in one place and 2.11 in other places.
Now, we report consistently the version that was used in sbt.

Additionaly, if version countains SNAPSHOT or NIGHTLY it will also report git sha.

Copy link
Member

@dottybot dottybot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉

All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️

Commit Messages

We want to keep history, but for that to actually be useful we have
some rules on how to format our commit messages (relevant xkcd).

Please stick to these guidelines for commit messages:

  1. Separate subject from body with a blank line
  2. When fixing an issue, start your commit message with Fix #<ISSUE-NBR>:
  3. Limit the subject line to 72 characters
  4. Capitalize the subject line
  5. Do not end the subject line with a period
  6. Use the imperative mood in the subject line ("Added" instead of "Add")
  7. Wrap the body at 80 characters
  8. Use the body to explain what and why vs. how

adapted from https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit

Have an awesome day! ☀️

@liufengyun
Copy link
Contributor

@DarkDimius Could you check the compilation failure and run CI again?

@@ -135,4 +135,10 @@ trait PropertiesTrait {
}
okVersions exists (javaVersion startsWith _)
}

// provide a main method so version info can be obtained by running this
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This commit is called "Remove unnecessary main" but it adds the main back.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, something got screwed during rebase. Commit messages also got off-by-one, and the implementation of java8 check simply disappeared.

@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ object CompilerCommand extends DotClass {
else if (settings.version.value) {
ctx.echo(versionMsg)
Nil
} else if (!Properties.isJavaAtLeast("1.8")) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think dotty is going to work out of the box on Java 9, so we should probably make this an equality check

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DarkDimius The CI shows this line doesn't work.

@DarkDimius
Copy link
Contributor Author

re-rebased and force-pushed. Checked locally.

@liufengyun
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, thanks @DarkDimius !

@liufengyun liufengyun merged commit b74fca1 into scala:master May 26, 2017
@allanrenucci allanrenucci deleted the command-line branch December 14, 2017 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants