Skip to content

Refactor/def trees #220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 11, 2014
Merged

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Nov 10, 2014

Avoid redundancy between mods in trees and equivalent symbol information. Review by @DarkDimius

Typed MemberDef trees now take the modifiers from their symbol's data.
withMods should never be used to produce a typed tree, because typed
member defs get their modifiers from their symbols.
@DarkDimius
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise LGTM

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Nov 11, 2014

Force pushed last commit, which missed an import before.

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Nov 11, 2014

@DarkDimius can you have a look at the last commit (should be non-controversial) and merge if LGTY?

DarkDimius added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2014
@DarkDimius DarkDimius merged commit 7978a5f into scala:master Nov 11, 2014
@odersky odersky deleted the refactor/DefTrees branch November 13, 2014 10:06
WojciechMazur pushed a commit to WojciechMazur/dotty that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
Backport "Fix stack overflow errors when generating opaque type proxies" to 3.3 LTS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants