-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Make implicit function variables safe as arguments (fixes #10889) #13750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 4 commits
e30dffa
a54bfd4
54f50e5
9133065
e76f078
009f18b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | ||
package dotty.tools | ||
package dotc | ||
package transform | ||
|
||
import MegaPhase._ | ||
import core._ | ||
import Symbols._ | ||
import SymDenotations._ | ||
import Contexts._ | ||
import Types._ | ||
import Flags._ | ||
import Decorators._ | ||
import DenotTransformers._ | ||
import core.StdNames.nme | ||
import core.StdNames | ||
import ast.Trees._ | ||
import reporting.trace | ||
|
||
/** Transforms function arguments which are context functions to | ||
* avoid a build-up of redundant thunks when passed repeatedly, | ||
* e.g. due to recursion. | ||
* | ||
* This is necessary because the compiler produces a contextual | ||
* closure around values passed as arguments where a context function | ||
* is expected, unless that value has the syntactic form of a context | ||
* function literal. | ||
* | ||
* This makes for very ergonomic client code, but the implementation | ||
* requires the wrapper to be genereated before type information is available. | ||
elfprince13 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* Thus, it can't be determine if the passed value is already a context function | ||
elfprince13 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* of the expected type, and the closure must be generated either way. | ||
* | ||
* Without this phase, when a contextual function is passed as an argument to a | ||
* recursive function, that would have the unfortunate effect of a linear growth | ||
* in transient thunks of identical type wrapped around each other, leading | ||
* to performance degradation, and in some cases, stack overflows. | ||
* | ||
* For additional reading material, please refer to the Simplicitly paper and/or | ||
* the discussion at https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/issues/10889 | ||
*/ | ||
class ElimContextClosures extends MiniPhase with IdentityDenotTransformer { thisPhase: DenotTransformer => | ||
import ast.tpd._ | ||
import ast.untpd | ||
|
||
override def phaseName:String = ElimContextClosures.name | ||
|
||
override def transformApply(tree: Apply)(using Context): Tree = | ||
trace(s"transforming ${tree.show} at phase ${ctx.phase}", show = true) { | ||
|
||
def transformArg(arg: Tree, formal: Type): Tree = { | ||
val formal1 = formal.widenDealias | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In fact, There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Presumably this applies to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorted in 009f18b. |
||
if defn.isContextFunctionType(formal1) && untpd.isContextualClosure(arg) then | ||
val body = unsplice(closureBody(arg)) match { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it would be better to start like this unsplice(closureBody(arg)) match
case Apply(Select(body, nme.apply, _) =>
... // transformation code
case _ =>
arg If the argument is not a nested closure there's no need to go through the following tests, right? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry, I meant: after the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. oh, I see now, yes. Should be addressed in 009f18b. |
||
case Apply(Select(fn, nme.apply), _) => fn | ||
case other => other | ||
} // no-op if not a nested closure of some kind | ||
val underlyingBodyType = body.tpe.widenDealias | ||
val bodyIsContextual = defn.isContextFunctionType(underlyingBodyType) | ||
val bodyTypeMatches = TypeComparer.isSubType(underlyingBodyType, formal1) | ||
if bodyIsContextual && bodyTypeMatches then | ||
body | ||
else | ||
arg | ||
|
||
else | ||
arg | ||
} | ||
|
||
val mt @ MethodType(_) = tree.fun.tpe.widen | ||
val args1 = tree.args.zipWithConserve(mt.paramInfos)(transformArg) | ||
cpy.Apply(tree)(tree.fun, args1) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object ElimContextClosures { | ||
val name: String = "elimContextClosures" | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
true |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ | ||
import scala.annotation.tailrec | ||
|
||
import java.lang.management.ManagementFactory | ||
import java.lang.management.RuntimeMXBean | ||
|
||
import scala.jdk.CollectionConverters._ | ||
|
||
object Test { | ||
trait Txn {} | ||
type AtomicOp[Z] = Txn ?=> Z | ||
type VanillaAtomicOp[Z] = Txn => Z | ||
|
||
object AbortAndRetry extends scala.util.control.ControlThrowable("abort and retry") {} | ||
|
||
def beginTxn:Txn = new Txn {} | ||
|
||
@tailrec def retryN[Z](n:Int)(txn:AtomicOp[Z], i:Int = 0):Z = { | ||
try { | ||
given Txn = beginTxn | ||
val ret:Z = txn | ||
if(i < n) { throw AbortAndRetry } | ||
ret | ||
} catch { | ||
case AbortAndRetry => retryN(n)(txn, i + 1) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
@tailrec def safeRetryN[Z](n:Int)(txn:VanillaAtomicOp[Z], i:Int = 0):Z = { | ||
try { | ||
given Txn = beginTxn | ||
val ret:Z = txn.asInstanceOf[AtomicOp[Z]] | ||
if(i < n) { throw AbortAndRetry } | ||
ret | ||
} catch { | ||
case AbortAndRetry => safeRetryN(n)(txn, i + 1) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object StackSize { | ||
def unapply(arg:String):Option[Int] = { | ||
Option(arg match { | ||
case s"-Xss$rest" => rest | ||
case s"-XX:ThreadStackSize=$rest" => rest | ||
case _ => null | ||
}).map{ rest => | ||
val shift = (rest.toLowerCase.last match { | ||
case 'k' => 10 | ||
case 'm' => 20 | ||
case 'g' => 30 | ||
case _ => 0 | ||
}) | ||
(if(shift > 0) { | ||
rest.dropRight(1) | ||
} else { | ||
rest | ||
}).toInt << shift | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
def main(args:Array[String]) = { | ||
val arguments = ManagementFactory.getRuntimeMXBean.getInputArguments | ||
// 64bit VM defaults to 1024K / 1M stack size, 32bit defaults to 320k | ||
// Use 1024 as upper bound. | ||
val maxStackSize:Int = arguments.asScala.reverseIterator.collectFirst{case StackSize(stackSize) => stackSize}.getOrElse(1 << 20) | ||
|
||
val testTxn:VanillaAtomicOp[Boolean] = { | ||
(txn:Txn) => | ||
given Txn = txn | ||
true | ||
} | ||
|
||
Console.println(try { | ||
// maxStackSize is a good upper bound on linear stack growth | ||
// without assuming too much about frame size | ||
// (1 byte / frame is conservative even for a z80) | ||
retryN(maxStackSize)(testTxn.asInstanceOf[AtomicOp[Boolean]]) == safeRetryN(maxStackSize)(testTxn) | ||
} catch { | ||
case e:StackOverflowError => | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Isn't it easier to just probe stack depth with (Generally wary of tests for SOE and OOM.) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure I see what you have in mind, can you be a little bit more explicit? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. apologies in advance if I'm missing the whole point, I'm still reading the issue. I was thinking of https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/2.13.x/test/junit/scala/collection/IteratorTest.scala#L36 although counting frames is subject to optimizations. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ah, sure, we could have the return value from |
||
Console.println(s"Exploded after ${e.getStackTrace.length} frames") | ||
false | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
} |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.