Skip to content

Fix an example of covariant type #10734

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2020
Merged

Fix an example of covariant type #10734

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/docs/reference/new-types/type-lambdas-spec.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ is treated as a shorthand for
```
Abstract types and opaque type aliases remember the variances they were created with. So the type
```scala
def F2[-A, +B]
type F2[-A, +B]
```
is known to be contravariant in `A` and covariant in `B` and can be instantiated only
with types that satisfy these constraints. Likewise
Expand Down