Use jl.Class'es instead of ClassTag's in structural calls. #10388
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This simplifies the life of everyone: the expansion of structural calls, the implementation of
scala.reflect.Selectable
, and the reverse engineering performed by the Scala.js back-end.As a side benefit, the new transformation supports bottom types in the arguments. It was previously limited because we do not allow the generation of
ClassTag
s forNull
andNothing
: they are unsound in arrays, which is whatClassTag
s are designed for, but on their own they have perfectly validClass
'es.