We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://gitter.im/lampepfl/dotty?at=5d88c6115d24375b3e075ca0
I'm claiming this generates the wrong code because it gives a warning under "-strict".
It appears that this warning pops up alot when -strict is set. I'm also getting these warnings on given instance declarations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think -strict should just not emit warnings for def foo_=, setters should be writable without using @alpha.
-strict
def foo_=
@alpha
Sorry, something went wrong.
aa50558
Merge pull request #7316 from dotty-staging/fix-#7296
2bdec59
Fix #7296: Don't flag setter names as operator names
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
https://gitter.im/lampepfl/dotty?at=5d88c6115d24375b3e075ca0
I'm claiming this generates the wrong code because it gives a warning under "-strict".
It appears that this warning pops up alot when -strict is set. I'm also getting these warnings on given instance declarations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: