Skip to content

Release RC1 #11416

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
35 tasks done
anatoliykmetyuk opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed
35 tasks done

Release RC1 #11416

anatoliykmetyuk opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
itype:meta Issues about process/similar

Comments

@anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor

anatoliykmetyuk commented Feb 15, 2021

Instructions on how to release

@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk added the itype:meta Issues about process/similar label Feb 15, 2021
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk self-assigned this Feb 15, 2021
@anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pending #11410.

@anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

anatoliykmetyuk commented Feb 16, 2021

Related PRs:

@larsrh
Copy link

larsrh commented Feb 16, 2021

We need a new release of sbt-dotty, too: f75e6fb

@smarter
Copy link
Member

smarter commented Feb 16, 2021

sbt-dotty 0.5.3 release job: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/actions/runs/572300705

@ShapelessCat
Copy link
Contributor

3.0.0-RC1 release page mentions "Allow with after class #11157" in the Syntax section, and I think this is NOT right.
#11213 already reverted #11157.

Here is the final decision of keep using :: https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/feedback-sought-optional-braces/4702/588.

@bishabosha
Copy link
Member

bishabosha commented Feb 17, 2021

@ShapelessCat I can do it in the repl

Scala compiler version 3.0.0-RC1 -- Copyright 2002-2021, LAMP/EPFL
scala> class Foo with
     |   def foo = 23
     | 
// defined class Foo

scala> Foo().foo                                                                                                        
val res0: Int = 23

@ShapelessCat
Copy link
Contributor

@bishabosha Does this mean the after classes with syntax is a syntax that we plan to remove, but we haven't removed it completely?
I can also see a discussion in Add RC1 blog article #11417.

@bishabosha
Copy link
Member

@ShapelessCat I am not sure what's happening, but thank you for linking to the discussion, I added my example there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
itype:meta Issues about process/similar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants