Support JDK 20 by upgrading to ASM 9.4 #10184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Philippus Would you mind targeting 2.12.x for the upgrade? Then we can merge it forward on to 2.13.x as usual. reminder to self: I should add a notice to the JDK compatibility page that 2.12.18 and 2.13.11 will have this support. |
|
I made it a separate PR, like last time. Hope that's ok. |
|
Maybe I'm being forgetful... is it a tricky merge? If it's a tricky merge, then it makes sense to have two PRs from the start. (Regardless, it doesn't matter much either way.) |
|
I think last time(s) it was a tricky merge indeed. |
|
I've been swamped in recent weeks, but now that the 2.13.10 dust has settled I do intend to get back to this. |
SethTisue
force-pushed
the
update/asm-9.4
branch
from
0b899c8 to
78ad9c9
Compare
|
I manually tested this by installing a JDK 20 early access build on my Mac (with |
smarter
added a commit
to scala/scala3
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2022
scala 2.12.x PR: scala/scala#10185 scala 2.13.x PR: scala/scala#10184
SethTisue
changed the title
This was referenced May 8, 2023
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
to apache/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade Scala to 2.13.11 - https://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.13.11 Additionally, this pr adds a new suppression rule for warning message: `Implicit definition should have explicit type`, this is a new compile check introduced by scala/scala#10083, we must fix it when we upgrading to use Scala 3, ### Why are the changes needed? This release improves collections, adds support for JDK 20 and 21, adds support for JDK 17 `sealed`: - scala/scala#10363 - scala/scala#10184 - scala/scala#10397 - scala/scala#10348 - scala/scala#10105 There are 2 known issues in this version: - scala/bug#12800 - scala/bug#12799 For the first one, there is no compilation warning messages related to `match may not be exhaustive` in Spark compile log, and for the second one, there is no case of `method.isAnnotationPresent(Deprecated.class)` in Spark code, there is just https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8c84d2c9349d7b607db949c2e114df781f23e438/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala#L130 in Spark Code, and I checked `javax.annotation.Nonnull` no this issue. So I think These two issues will not affect Spark itself, but this doesn't mean it won't affect the code written by end users themselves The full release notes as follows: - https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.11 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, this is a Scala version change. ### How was this patch tested? - Existing Test - Checked Java 8/17 + Scala 2.13.11 using GA, all test passed Java 8 + Scala 2.13.11: https://github.com/LuciferYang/spark/runs/14337279564 Java 17 + Scala 2.13.11: https://github.com/LuciferYang/spark/runs/14343012195 Closes #41626 from LuciferYang/SPARK-40497. Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
czxm
pushed a commit
to czxm/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade Scala to 2.13.11 - https://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.13.11 Additionally, this pr adds a new suppression rule for warning message: `Implicit definition should have explicit type`, this is a new compile check introduced by scala/scala#10083, we must fix it when we upgrading to use Scala 3, ### Why are the changes needed? This release improves collections, adds support for JDK 20 and 21, adds support for JDK 17 `sealed`: - scala/scala#10363 - scala/scala#10184 - scala/scala#10397 - scala/scala#10348 - scala/scala#10105 There are 2 known issues in this version: - scala/bug#12800 - scala/bug#12799 For the first one, there is no compilation warning messages related to `match may not be exhaustive` in Spark compile log, and for the second one, there is no case of `method.isAnnotationPresent(Deprecated.class)` in Spark code, there is just https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8c84d2c9349d7b607db949c2e114df781f23e438/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala#L130 in Spark Code, and I checked `javax.annotation.Nonnull` no this issue. So I think These two issues will not affect Spark itself, but this doesn't mean it won't affect the code written by end users themselves The full release notes as follows: - https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.11 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, this is a Scala version change. ### How was this patch tested? - Existing Test - Checked Java 8/17 + Scala 2.13.11 using GA, all test passed Java 8 + Scala 2.13.11: https://github.com/LuciferYang/spark/runs/14337279564 Java 17 + Scala 2.13.11: https://github.com/LuciferYang/spark/runs/14343012195 Closes apache#41626 from LuciferYang/SPARK-40497. Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
to apache/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to re-upgrade Scala to 2.13.11, after SPARK-45144 was merged, the build issues mentioned in #41943 should no longer exist. - https://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.13.11 Additionally, this pr adds a new suppression rule for warning message: `Implicit definition should have explicit type`, this is a new compile check introduced by scala/scala#10083, we must fix it when we upgrading to use Scala 3 ### Why are the changes needed? This release improves collections, adds support for JDK 20 and 21, adds support for JDK 17 `sealed`: - scala/scala#10363 - scala/scala#10184 - scala/scala#10397 - scala/scala#10348 - scala/scala#10105 There are 2 known issues in this version: - scala/bug#12800 - scala/bug#12799 For the first one, there is no compilation warning messages related to `match may not be exhaustive` in Spark compile log, and for the second one, there is no case of `method.isAnnotationPresent(Deprecated.class)` in Spark code, there is just https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8c84d2c9349d7b607db949c2e114df781f23e438/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala#L130 in Spark Code, and I checked `javax.annotation.Nonnull` no this issue. So I think These two issues will not affect Spark itself, but this doesn't mean it won't affect the code written by end users themselves The full release notes as follows: - https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.11 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, this is a Scala version change. ### How was this patch tested? - Existing Test ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes #42918 from LuciferYang/SPARK-40497-2. Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
szehon-ho
pushed a commit
to szehon-ho/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2024
This PR aims to re-upgrade Scala to 2.13.11, after SPARK-45144 was merged, the build issues mentioned in apache#41943 should no longer exist. - https://www.scala-lang.org/news/2.13.11 Additionally, this pr adds a new suppression rule for warning message: `Implicit definition should have explicit type`, this is a new compile check introduced by scala/scala#10083, we must fix it when we upgrading to use Scala 3 This release improves collections, adds support for JDK 20 and 21, adds support for JDK 17 `sealed`: - scala/scala#10363 - scala/scala#10184 - scala/scala#10397 - scala/scala#10348 - scala/scala#10105 There are 2 known issues in this version: - scala/bug#12800 - scala/bug#12799 For the first one, there is no compilation warning messages related to `match may not be exhaustive` in Spark compile log, and for the second one, there is no case of `method.isAnnotationPresent(Deprecated.class)` in Spark code, there is just https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8c84d2c9349d7b607db949c2e114df781f23e438/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala#L130 in Spark Code, and I checked `javax.annotation.Nonnull` no this issue. So I think These two issues will not affect Spark itself, but this doesn't mean it won't affect the code written by end users themselves The full release notes as follows: - https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.11 Yes, this is a Scala version change. - Existing Test No Closes apache#42918 from LuciferYang/SPARK-40497-2. Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's first some work to be done in https://github.com/scala/scala-asm.