List _all_ operations available via implicit enrichment in README

[erikvanoosten]

In README.md this removes the incomplete list with operations available via implicit enrichment and replaces it with a link per decorator and a plain text list of all available operators per decorator.

[erikvanoosten]

I have signed the Scala CLA.

[linasm]

@erikvanoosten are you sure listing all methods on each collection is a good idea?

I mean, most of the new methods are inherited from Iterable by the whole collections hierarchy. And you wouldn't want to mention them all (eg. Vector, etc.) in the README. On the other hand, the new generic methods would get listed on BitSet now, only because accidentally BitSet got some specific methods added to it.

IMHO this would make it harder to identify the methods added to specific subhierarchies of collections.

[erikvanoosten]

No, I am not sure of that :)

What initiated this pull request is that I was unaware of Iterator.splitBy. I assumed Iterator was not enriched by this library and wrote it myself. Then when I wanted to contribute it, and looked in the source it was already there!

What might be better is to just have the list of enriched traits and leave out the operations, OR
list just a few important operations and then say something like '...' or 'and more'.

[erikvanoosten]

Another option is to list the operations, and for each (group of) operation mention for which traits it is implemented.

[julienrf]

I think keeping this list up to date will be complicated. What about just linking to each decorator documentation?

BTW, I’m surprised to see MapDecorator methods available on IterableDecorator… https://static.javadoc.io/org.scala-lang.modules/scala-collection-contrib_2.13/0.2.0/scala/collection/decorators/IterableDecorator.html

[linasm]

What initiated this pull request is that I was unaware of Iterator.splitBy.

Well, Iterator / Iterable are different branches of collections hierarchy and so they got separate decorators in this library. I guess some level of README duplication in case like this actually makes sense.

[erikvanoosten]

I removed the implied operations and appended ... to make the curious reader follow the link. WDYT?

[julienrf]

Thanks Erik!