Skip to content

rewrite rule Set#-- => &~ or diff #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
xuwei-k opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

rewrite rule Set#-- => &~ or diff #28

xuwei-k opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 4 comments
Milestone
Week 27

Comments

@xuwei-k
Copy link
Contributor

xuwei-k commented May 15, 2018

https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/d95b53e188a872cdc4c192e4c0587aa3d36568ec/src/library/scala/collection/Set.scala#L144-L156
@MasseGuillaume
Copy link
Contributor

There are more depreciations on Set: #44

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, if scala/scala#6782 gets merged we won’t need that rewrite rule.

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

julienrf commented Jul 2, 2018

We can not rewrite -- to diff because their signatures don’t match. We could rewrite it to xs.toSet -- ys.

@julienrf julienrf mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2018
Closed
@julienrf julienrf added this to the Week 27 milestone Jul 5, 2018
@MasseGuillaume
Copy link
Contributor

Let's close this issue since it's a deprecation now: scala/scala#6857
The deprecation meta-ticket is here: #44

martijnhoekstra pushed a commit to martijnhoekstra/scala-collection-compat that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2022
@dwijnand
Merge pull request scala#28 from Toromtomtom/fix-scaladoc
51db7e6 
Remove an unresolvable Scaladoc macro call
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Week 27
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@julienrf @xuwei-k @MasseGuillaume