Skip to content

Corrects a mistake in the article on implicit conversions #710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2017
Merged

Corrects a mistake in the article on implicit conversions #710

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tutorials/tour/_posts/2017-02-13-implicit-conversions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ An implicit conversion from type `S` to type `T` is defined by an implicit value
Implicit conversions are applied in two situations:

* If an expression `e` is of type `S`, and `S` does not conform to the expression's expected type `T`.
* In a selection `e.m` with `e` of type `T`, if the selector `m` does not denote a member of `T`.
* In a selection `e.m` with `e` of type `S`, if the selector `m` does not denote a member of `S`.

In the first case, a conversion `c` is searched for which is applicable to `e` and whose result type conforms to `T`.
In the second case, a conversion `c` is searched for which is applicable to `e` and whose result contains a member named `m`.
Expand Down