Skip to content

Make sure SIP numbers are used exactly once, and proposals use exactly one number #2390

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2022

Conversation

julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

@julienrf julienrf commented May 4, 2022

In #2389 I assigned the number 34 to a SIP although that number was already used by another one. I noticed that a couple of other proposals were using the number 36, and that another proposal was using two numbers.

I propose these changes so that numbers are used at most once, and proposals use at most one number.

@julienrf julienrf requested a review from sjrd May 4, 2022 09:23
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
layout: sip
title: SIP-36 - Byname implicit arguments
title: SIP-31 - Byname implicit arguments
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wasn't there any 31 before? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn’t find it.

$ grep -r "SIP-31" _sips/sips/ returned no match.

@julienrf julienrf merged commit c247790 into scala:main May 4, 2022
@julienrf julienrf deleted the fix-sip-numbers branch May 4, 2022 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants