Skip to content

Clarifications for List blocks #1260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

jducoeur
Copy link
Contributor

Having just spent a couple of hours trying to figure out how to make list blocks work, here's a tweak to provide the information that would have made my life easier. It was previously taking for granted a few details that may be obvious if you are experienced in specific wikitext languages, but aren't otherwise.

(In particular, the fact that you must have extra space before the bullets, that you may only use, eg, 1. as a lead-in identifier, not 2., and that additional spaces create sub-levels. None of those are true of standard Markdown, which is the most common such language.)

Having just spent a couple of hours trying to figure out how to make list blocks work, here's a tweak to provide the information that would have made my life easier.  It was previously taking for granted a few details that may be obvious if you are experienced in specific wikitext languages, but aren't otherwise.

(In particular, the fact that you *must* have extra space before the bullets, that you may *only* use, eg, `1.` as a lead-in identifier, not `2.`, and that additional spaces create sub-levels.  None of those are true of [standard Markdown](https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax), which is the most common such language.)
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

review by @janekdb ?

@propensive propensive merged commit 10b6831 into scala:master Jan 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants