Skip to content

Deduplicate historical Java version tag and upgrade client library #120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

retronym
Copy link
Member

The new way of extracting the Java version doesn't include the internal
build number, so remove that from historical data.

First, upgrade the InfluxDB client library.

This fixes two issues that I reported long ago with Nginx reverse proxy
and basic authentication, so remove the workarounds.

It also has a new feature to talk to the server in a binary protocal
(Message Pack). Apart from being more efficient (which doesn't really
matter much to us) it also doesn't lose track of int vs float
data types when doing a bulk query (like we do in the migrator)
which avoids needing to manually narrow "sampleCount" to a integral
type.

The new way of extracting the Java version doesn't include the internal
build number, so remove that from historical data.

First, upgrade the InfluxDB client library.

This fixes two issues that I reported long ago with Nginx reverse proxy
and basic authentication, so remove the workarounds.

It also has a new feature to talk to the server in a binary protocal
(Message Pack). Apart from being more efficient (which doesn't really
matter much to us) it also doesn't lose track of int vs float
data types when doing a bulk query (like we do in the migrator)
which avoids needing to manually narrow "sampleCount" to a integral
type.
@retronym retronym force-pushed the topic/influx-client-bump-and-migrate-java-version branch from 777c6ad to 5581395 Compare May 25, 2021 12:13
@retronym retronym merged commit 0ca3df2 into scala:main May 25, 2021
@retronym retronym deleted the topic/influx-client-bump-and-migrate-java-version branch May 25, 2021 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant