-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Mark drop calls in landing pads cold
instead of noinline
#92419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
// no-system-llvm: needs #92110 | ||
// compile-flags: -Cno-prepopulate-passes | ||
#![crate_type = "lib"] | ||
|
||
// This test checks that drop calls in unwind landing pads | ||
// get the `cold` attribute. | ||
|
||
// CHECK-LABEL: @check_cold | ||
// CHECK: call void {{.+}}drop_in_place{{.+}} [[ATTRIBUTES:#[0-9]+]] | ||
// CHECK: attributes [[ATTRIBUTES]] = { cold } | ||
#[no_mangle] | ||
pub fn check_cold(f: fn(), x: Box<u32>) { | ||
// this may unwind | ||
f(); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
// no-system-llvm: needs #92110 + patch for Rust alloc/dealloc functions | ||
// compile-flags: -Copt-level=3 | ||
#![crate_type = "lib"] | ||
|
||
// This test checks that we can inline drop_in_place in | ||
// unwind landing pads. | ||
|
||
// Without inlining, the box pointers escape via the call to drop_in_place, | ||
// and LLVM will not optimize out the pointer comparison. | ||
// With inlining, everything should be optimized out. | ||
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46515 | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @check_no_escape_in_landingpad | ||
// CHECK: start: | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
#[no_mangle] | ||
pub fn check_no_escape_in_landingpad(f: fn()) { | ||
let x = &*Box::new(0); | ||
let y = &*Box::new(0); | ||
|
||
if x as *const _ == y as *const _ { | ||
f(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Without inlining, the compiler can't tell that | ||
// dropping an empty string (in a landing pad) does nothing. | ||
// With inlining, the landing pad should be optimized out. | ||
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87055 | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @check_eliminate_noop_drop | ||
// CHECK: start: | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: call void %g() | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void | ||
#[no_mangle] | ||
pub fn check_eliminate_noop_drop(g: fn()) { | ||
let _var = String::new(); | ||
g(); | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checking for non-system llvm feels a bit hacky, not sure if I should just wait for the LLVM 14 release.
(this code is also assuming that https://reviews.llvm.org/D115497 won't be reverted upstream before then)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems sufficiently reasonable thing to do to me if this does in fact yield any significant benefits. I wouldn't want to land changes that potentially significantly affect performance at some time in the future as it would make those other changes non-representative on their own merits.