Skip to content

Fix small typos in std::rand documentation #20086

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2014
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/libstd/rand/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
//! so the "quality" of `/dev/random` is not better than `/dev/urandom` in most cases.
//! However, this means that `/dev/urandom` can yield somewhat predictable randomness
//! if the entropy pool is very small, such as immediately after first booting.
//! Linux 3,17 added `getrandom(2)` system call which solves the issue: it blocks if entropy
//! Linux 3.17 added the `getrandom(2)` system call which solves the issue: it blocks if entropy
//! pool is not initialized yet, but it does not block once initialized.
//! `OsRng` tries to use `getrandom(2)` if available, and use `/dev/urandom` fallback if not.
//! If an application does not have `getrandom` and likely to be run soon after first booting,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
//! > Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
//!
//! The rather unintuitive answer is that you will have a 2/3 chance of winning if
//! you switch and a 1/3 chance of winning of you don't, so it's better to switch.
//! you switch and a 1/3 chance of winning if you don't, so it's better to switch.
//!
//! This program will simulate the game show and with large enough simulation steps
//! it will indeed confirm that it is better to switch.
Expand Down