Improve the documentation of Display and FromStr, and their interactions

library/core/src/fmt/mod.rs

@@ -928,6 +928,20 @@ pub use macros::Debug;
 /// [tostring]: ../../std/string/trait.ToString.html
 /// [tostring_function]: ../../std/string/trait.ToString.html#tymethod.to_string
 ///
+/// # Completeness and parseability
+///
+/// `Display` for a type might not necessarily be a lossless or complete representation of the type.
+/// It may omit internal state, precision, or other information the type does not consider important
+/// for user-facing output, as determined by the type. As such, the output of `Display` might not be
+/// possible to parse, and even if it is, the result of parsing might not exactly match the original
+/// value.
+///
+/// However, if a type has a lossless `Display` implementation whose output is meant to be
+/// conveniently machine-parseable and not just meant for human consumption, then the type may wish
+/// to accept the same format in `FromStr`, and document that usage. Having both `Display` and
+/// `FromStr` implementations where the result of `Display` cannot be parsed with `FromStr` may
+/// surprise users.
+///
 /// # Internationalization
 ///
 /// Because a type can only have one `Display` implementation, it is often preferable

library/core/src/str/traits.rs

@@ -756,6 +756,20 @@ unsafe impl SliceIndex<str> for ops::RangeToInclusive<usize> {
 /// parse an `i32` with `FromStr`, but not a `&i32`. You can parse a struct that
 /// contains an `i32`, but not one that contains an `&i32`.
 ///
+/// # Input format and round-tripping
+///
+/// The input format expected by a type's `FromStr` implementation depends on the type. Check the
+/// type's documentation for the input formats it knows how to parse. Note that the input format of
+/// a type's `FromStr` implementation might not necessarily accept the output format of its
+/// `Display` implementation, and even if it does, the `Display` implementation may not be lossless
+/// so the round-trip may lose information.
+///
+/// However, if a type has a lossless `Display` implementation whose output is meant to be
+/// conveniently machine-parseable and not just meant for human consumption, then the type may wish
+/// to accept the same format in `FromStr`, and document that usage. Having both `Display` and
+/// `FromStr` implementations where the result of `Display` cannot be parsed with `FromStr` may
+/// surprise users.
+///
 /// # Examples
 ///
 /// Basic implementation of `FromStr` on an example `Point` type: