Skip to content

Set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH when running tests #12099

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2014

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This way when you disable rpaths you can still run make check

This way when you disable rpaths you can still run `make check`
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 8, 2014

This may be sufficient to remove the absolute rpath to the original output directory (which only exists so we can make copies during the build process that break relative paths).

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2014
This way when you disable rpaths you can still run `make check`
@bors bors closed this Feb 8, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 28b72cd into rust-lang:master Feb 8, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the rpath-tests branch February 9, 2014 00:18
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
fix rust-lang#11986 Aliases break resolution of qualified variants in patterns
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
…l, r=llogiq

Don't emit `struct_field_names` lint if all fields are booleans and don't start with the type's name

Fixes rust-lang#11936.

I only checked that all fields are booleans and not the prefix (nor the suffix) because when I started to list accepted prefixes (like "is", "has", "should", "could", etc), the list was starting to get a bit too long and I thought it was not really worth for such a small change.

r? `@llogiq`

changelog: Don't emit `struct_field_names` lint if all fields are booleans and don't start with the type's name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants