You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem isn't coming from intra links contrary to my first thought but just that we're "removing" links. For instance we use [fold] but define it below, therefore the markdown cannot generate the link.
No, I wrote the fix. However it'll certainly break a few things in the std (same issue with short doc when listing items at the top level, the non absolute urls will be bad haha).
…illaumeGomez
rustdoc: do not use plain summary for trait impls
Fixesrust-lang#38386.
Fixesrust-lang#48332.
Fixesrust-lang#49430.
Fixesrust-lang#62741.
Fixesrust-lang#73474.
Unfortunately this is not quite ready to go because the newly-working links trigger a bunch of linkcheck failures. The failures are tough to fix because the links are resolved relative to the implementor, which could be anywhere in the module hierarchy.
(In the current docs, these links end up rendering as uninterpreted markdown syntax, so I don't think these failures are any worse than the status quo. It might be acceptable to just add them to the linkchecker whitelist.)
Ideally this could be fixed with intra-doc links ~~but it isn't working for me: I am currently investigating if it's possible to solve it this way.~~ Opened rust-lang#73829.
EDIT: This is now ready!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/iter/struct.Flatten.html#method.scan


https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.scan
As we can see,
fold
is not linked in the first image.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: