Skip to content

Only compute which types we can derive PartialEq for if we'll use it #913

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2017

Conversation

fitzgen
Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen commented Aug 14, 2017

If we aren't going to derive PartialEq, then it doesn't make sense to even run the analysis.

r? @photoszzt or @emilio

If we aren't going to derive `PartialEq`, then it doesn't make sense to even run
the analysis.
@photoszzt
Copy link
Contributor

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link

@photoszzt: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member Author

fitzgen commented Aug 14, 2017

@bors-servo r=photoszzt

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit e76cde9 has been approved by photoszzt

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit e76cde9 with merge 74834c7...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2017
Only compute which types we can derive PartialEq for if we'll use it

If we aren't going to derive `PartialEq`, then it doesn't make sense to even run the analysis.

r? @photoszzt or @emilio
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: photoszzt
Pushing 74834c7 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit e76cde9 into rust-lang:master Aug 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants