Skip to content

Be able to represent Complex types with the correct layout. #73

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2016

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Oct 2, 2016

r? @nox

@nox
Copy link
Contributor

nox commented Oct 21, 2016

Could we do struct Complex<T> { real: T, imm: T }? r=me otherwise.

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Oct 21, 2016

That's #72. I'm all in for that, but it requires a bit more complexity and code. Not extremely hard to do, but I don't have cycles for that right now unfortunately :(

@bors-servo: r=nox

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit c1639f7 has been approved by nox

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit c1639f7 with merge 82a74d0...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2016
Be able to represent Complex types with the correct layout.

r? @nox
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit c1639f7 into rust-lang:master Oct 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants