Skip to content

Make the switch to LLVM3.9. #70

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Sep 29, 2016

r? @nox

I don't know if this will pass CI yet, let's see.

@highfive
Copy link

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify unsafe code. Please review it carefully!

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Sep 29, 2016

@bors-servo try

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Trying commit ddf9678 with merge 7822b96...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2016
Make the switch to LLVM3.9.

r? @nox

I don't know if this will pass CI yet, let's see.
@bors-servo
Copy link

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Sep 29, 2016

CI is blocked on travis-ci/apt-source-safelist#300

@bors-servo
Copy link

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #95) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nox
Copy link
Contributor

nox commented Oct 21, 2016

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

fitzgen commented Nov 15, 2016

What's the status of this? How eager are we to force llvm 3.9 and get rid of the llvm_stable feature?

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Dec 16, 2016

This is no longer relevant with runtime-libclang.

@emilio emilio closed this Dec 16, 2016
@emilio emilio deleted the llvm3.9 branch December 16, 2016 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants