Skip to content

Handle when we can't instantiate templates because we can't find a template definition #613

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2017

Conversation

fitzgen
Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen commented Apr 4, 2017

#594 + my review commetn about using opaque types

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member Author

fitzgen commented Apr 4, 2017

@bors-servo r=me

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor

emilio commented Apr 4, 2017

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit 71d1100 has been approved by emilio

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit 71d1100 with merge 475dd93...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2017
Handle when we can't instantiate templates because we can't find a template definition

#594 + my review commetn about using opaque types
@emilio
Copy link
Contributor

emilio commented Apr 4, 2017

@bors-servo r-

Actually, please remove the merge commit cherrypicking it on top of master.

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member Author

fitzgen commented Apr 4, 2017

@bors-servo r=emilio

rebased

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit eaf638b has been approved by emilio

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit eaf638b with merge e51789a...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2017
Handle when we can't instantiate templates because we can't find a template definition

#594 + my review commetn about using opaque types
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: emilio
Pushing e51789a to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit eaf638b into rust-lang:master Apr 4, 2017
@fitzgen fitzgen deleted the upsuper-libclang-4 branch April 4, 2017 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants