-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 747
Don't assume that base classes are already resolved. #360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
It's a bunch of complexity we don't use nor need.
PSA stylo people (@heycam, @upsuper, @bholley, @Manishearth), this is likely to produce a more-noisy-than-usual bindings update, since we parse stuff in different order. But I've verified this doesn't break anything in stylo. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Thanks @emilio :)
@@ -17,13 +18,13 @@ | |||
#![allow(non_upper_case_globals)] | |||
|
|||
#[macro_use] | |||
#[allow(unused_extern_crates)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It still warns here despite #[macro_use]
and our macro usage?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, that's a known false positive from that lint.
@bors-servo r+ |
📌 Commit b93faf9 has been approved by |
⚡ Test exempted - status |
Since it may not be the case.
Fixes #359
Also fixes a few other test cases in the codebase that had the wrong namespace relationship.
r? @fitzgen