Skip to content

clang: Simplify visiting code. #196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2016
Merged

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Nov 2, 2016

It has always been a mess.

r? @fitzgen

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Nov 2, 2016

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify unsafe code. Please review it carefully!

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Nov 2, 2016

@bors-servo delegate=fitzgen

@bors-servo
Copy link

✌️ @fitzgen can now approve this pull request

Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great clean up :)

@@ -306,18 +298,13 @@ impl Cursor {
/// Call the given function on each AST node traversed. See `CursorVisitor`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no long a CursorVisitor to go see the comments for. We should delete that part of the comment.

It has always been a mess.
@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Nov 3, 2016

@bors-servo r=fitzgen

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit 3fa7228 has been approved by fitzgen

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit 3fa7228 with merge ff12c0c...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2016
clang: Simplify visiting code.

It has always been a mess.

r? @fitzgen
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 3fa7228 into rust-lang:master Nov 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants