Skip to content

tests: Get rid of feature-specific tests. #181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2016

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Nov 1, 2016

The only difference in bindings is because the methods were inlined, so with
llvm 3.9 we can skip those.

The only difference in bindings is because the methods were inlined, so with
llvm 3.9 we can skip those.

Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <[email protected]>
@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Nov 1, 2016

r? @fitzgen

@bors-servo delegate=fitzgen

@bors-servo
Copy link

✌️ @fitzgen can now approve this pull request

Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Less moving parts! \o/

Are we reasonably sure that we won't start using new features that need their own, separate tests? I guess this infrastructure will always be in the commit history.

Kill it with fire, I say!

@bors-servo r+

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

fitzgen commented Nov 1, 2016

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit 737d644 has been approved by fitzgen

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit 737d644 with merge dfa2e8c...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2016
tests: Get rid of feature-specific tests.

The only difference in bindings is because the methods were inlined, so with
llvm 3.9 we can skip those.
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 737d644 into rust-lang:master Nov 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants