-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
Requirements: update django-allauth #9249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
\### 0.43.0 > In previous versions, the allauth app included a base.html template. This > template could conflict with an equally named template at project level. > Therefore, base.html has now been moved to account/base.html -- you will need > to check your templates and likely override account/base.html within your > project. We include our own base.html template, in order to make the allauth templates use our base template I have added a an account/base.html file that just extends from base.html. \### 0.44.0 > The certificate key part of the SOCIALACCOUNT_PROVIDERS configuration has been > renamed to certificate_key. This is done to prevent the key from being > displayed without being masked in Django debug pages. We don't use that field nor we access it from our application. \### 0.47.0 > Added a new setting SOCIALACCOUNT_LOGIN_ON_GET that controls whether or not the > endpoints for initiating a social login (for example, > "/accounts/google/login/") require a POST request to initiate the handshake. As > requiring a POST is more secure, the default of this new setting is False. This adds one more step for users before signing in with an external provider. > You are about to sign in using a third party account from GitHub. > [ Continue ] I have changed our list to be a form, so it stil is just a click away from our platform, but a link from outside will require the user to click on "continue". We can just set this setting to True if we want too (but there is a security notice that explains why isn't a good idea https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/blob/master/ChangeLog.rst#security-notice) \### 0.48.0 > The newly introduced ACCOUNT_PREVENT_ENUMERATION defaults to True impacting the > current behavior of the password reset flow. We want that. > The newly introduced rate limitting is by default turned on. You will need to > provide a 429.html template. We want this, I have added a 429.html template :) > The default of SOCIALACCOUNT_STORE_TOKENS has been changed to False. Rationale > is that storing sensitive information should be opt in, not opt out. If you > were relying on this functionality without having it explicitly turned on, > please add it to your settings.py. We rely on this, I have set it to true. \### 0.49.0 > Changed naming of internal_reset_url_key attribute in > allauth.account.views.PasswordResetFromKeyView to reset_url_key. We don't override this view.
21250a5
to
d10984e
Compare
The new settings are working as expected locally with ngrok :) |
@stsewd is this PR waiting on frontend fixes? |
The import page definitely needs a fix, that doesn't look great. The padding on the buttons isn't a big deal, but should also be an easy fix. |
yeah, just the CSS part is missing, it also needs to be fixed on .com. We could also leave it as before, but users will need to press another button to connect their account
currently this is done in a single click |
My instance isn't booting, so can't test anything at the moment. But the issue is that |
Also, I assume https://readthedocs.org/accounts/social/connections/ is likely affected too, as it also uses |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes included here so far look good, but the styles on at least li > form > button
need fixed to merge this.
Yeah, padding and text size both look smaller. That should be an easy fix though. |
Just to clarify, I'm not actively working on this. I'm happy to review this however and happy to answer any specific questions on the styles or CSS that come up. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Do we need to care about any kind of data migration of similar?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CSS changes look good!
Nope, nothing has changed on the models |
There is a PR on .com that we need to merge too |
0.43.0
We include our own base.html template,
in order to make the allauth templates
use our base template I have added an account/base.html
file that just extends from base.html.
0.44.0
We don't use that field, nor we access it from our application.
0.47.0
This adds one more step for users before signing in with an external provider.
I have changed our list of links to be a form,
so it still is just a click away inside our platform,
but a link from outside will require the user to click on "continue".
We can just set this setting to True if we want too,
but there is a security notice that explains why isn't a good idea https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/blob/master/ChangeLog.rst#security-notice.
We need to update the CSS from .com too, and I may need help with the .org CSS..
0.48.0
We want that.
We want this, I have added a 429.html template :)
We rely on this, I have set it to true.
0.49.0
We don't override this view.
Closes #9122