Spruce up docs on pull request builds #9177
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I keep helping users with the support request around webhooks missing the pull request event, so wanted to clarify a bit here. I also took the opportunity to add some clearer language to the rest of the page, and resturcture a few things to improve the information flow. I also opened #9176 to deal with this in a programmatic way, but figured we could at least communicate the issue better for now.
stsewd
approved these changes
May 9, 2022
Co-authored-by: Santos Gallegos <[email protected]>
humitos
approved these changes
May 10, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I keep helping users with the support request around webhooks missing
the pull request event, so wanted to clarify a bit here. I also took the
opportunity to add some clearer language to the rest of the page, and
resturcture a few things to improve the information flow.
I also opened #9176 to deal with this in a programmatic way, but figured
we could at least communicate the issue better for now.