Add documentation about webhooks for Gitea #8402
Conversation
Following discussion at #8364
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this pull request @steko ! I just left a comment about a typo. I'm wondering if we should be more clear about the fact that this might be a temporary solution or workaround, waiting on someone else from the team to weigh in.
Looks good to me! I'd probably add a link to the issue saying that this may be implemented at Read the Docs in the future. |
|
Rendered version: https://docs--8402.org.readthedocs.build/en/8402/webhooks.html#gitea |
|
|
||
| This isn't officially supported, but using the "GitHub webhook" is an effective workaround, | ||
| because Gitea uses the same payload as GitHub. The generic webhook is not compatibile with Gitea. | ||
| See `issue #8364`_ for more details. Official support may be implemented in the future. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Official support may be implemented in the future.
I'm not sure that decision has been made.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"may" or "may not", I don't think this paragraph conveys any certain decision?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it gives a "false hope", I don't see us adding another service like gitea, but implementing another solution like having a more configurable webhook processing instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm sorry the sentence sounds as a promise, it wasn't meant to be. I was trying to address this comment by @humitos. Feel free to remove it or rephrase it of course!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no worries, this might need some input from @ericholscher or @agjohnson if we actually want to add this to our roadmap.
Following the fruitful discussion at #8364 I added a paragraph about setting up a webhook for Gitea projects.