Skip to content

Augments the size of Subscription.request(n) from int to long and adds a... #82

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2014

Conversation

viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor

... spec provision that a cumulative demand of Long.MAX_VALUE MAY be treated as 'effectively unbounded'

See #62

…s a spec provision that a cumulative demand of Long.MAX_VALUE MAY be treated as 'effectively unbounded'
This was referenced Jul 14, 2014
@rkuhn
Copy link
Member

rkuhn commented Jul 14, 2014

LGTM

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@tmontgomery
Copy link

👍

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariusaeriksen @purplefox @normanmaurer @DougLea @GavinBierman

Yay or Nay?

@DougLea
Copy link
Contributor

DougLea commented Jul 16, 2014

Yes. This was one of my initial suggestions about API back in January, so I'm happy to see it back in the spec!

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Everyone has been given ample time to respond at least saying that they need more time to think about it.
Shall I merge?

@smaldini
Copy link
Contributor

Go for it :)

@smaldini
Copy link
Contributor

Easier to ask forgiveness and to try often!

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smaldini Lol. I just want to make sure no one feels steamrolled.

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Contributor

I say we move forward.

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1, merging since there's been 7 days grace period

viktorklang added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2014
Augments the size of Subscription.request(n) from int to long and adds a...
@viktorklang viktorklang merged commit 718c4d4 into master Jul 22, 2014
@viktorklang viktorklang deleted the wip-fix-62-√ branch July 22, 2014 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants