+tck #308 allow configuring "no events during N time" separately

[ktoso]

Because we all love quicker builds <3

Resolves #308

cc @viktorklang @jroper

[ktoso]

Build is failing on JDK6 due to same magic as seen in #302 (comment)
Must be some evil spirits (JVM crashes).

[ktoso]

Any chance for help resolving the build problems?
We'd (and others) would very much like this change

[viktorklang]

@ktoso Could you rebase this on master?

[ktoso]

Yes, rebased

On 5 April 2016 at 17:59:23, Viktor Klang (√) ([email protected]) wrote:

@ktoso Could you rebase this on master?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[viktorklang]

I'm pushing your branch to the repo and opening a local PR to see if Travis makes it pass.

[ktoso]

Hmmm, okey thanks. That'd be uber weird though if it then works hm, let's see

[patriknw]

this has not been released yet, right?

[viktorklang]

@patriknw No, we're gearing up for a 1.0.1 release but there are a few spec clarifications we need to deal with first. If you have time, since this is TCK-related you could make a local build and verify that the feature works.

[drewhk]

Ping @viktorklang

[viktorklang]

@drewhk Ah, the 1.0.1 release. We should try to roll that one out. What's the timeline?

[drewhk]

No particular timeline for us, just want to reduce build-times and we need this feature from the TCK. I just looked at old tickets and decided to ping.

[viktorklang]

SGTM

I am a bit swamped at the moment but hope we can prep the release soonish.

Cheers,
√

On Aug 30, 2016 4:05 PM, "drewhk" [email protected] wrote:

No particular timeline for us, just want to reduce build-times and we need
this feature from the TCK. I just looked at old tickets and decided to ping.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#309 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAqdzX4dEUHs-sDq1pRuXf6wYAs_if4ks5qlDisgaJpZM4H1qwo
.