-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 534
+tck explains createElement in more useful terms #250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -243,11 +243,17 @@ Subscriber rules Verification is split up into two files (styles) of tests. | |||
|
|||
The Blackbox Verification tests do not require the implementation under test to be modified at all, yet they are *not* able to verify most rules. In Whitebox Verification, more control over `request()` calls etc. is required in order to validate rules more precisely. | |||
|
|||
It is highly recommended to implement the `SubscriberBlackboxVerification<T>` instead of the blackbox one even if it is more troublesome to do so, as it can test far more corner cases in implementations that would otherwise be left untested (if only blackbox tests would be used). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems odd to recommend the blackbox instead of... the blackbox...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect the correct word is "work" rather than "troublesome".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- thanks!
- "if it is more troublesome to do so" sounds valid to me, but I'll reword/simplify :)
Thanks for the review, pushed fixups. // @viktorklang |
// Note to self, editing anything that needs attention in the github edit+pr window is a bad idea ;) |
LGTM! @reactive-streams/contributors This is a TCK documentation update addressing a question from @purplefox, merging this in 24h unless someone complains (so we can get RC4 out tomorrow). |
@reactive-streams/contributors Merging without objection |
+tck explains createElement in more useful terms
resolves #231