Temporarily Remove TCK Implementation

[benjchristensen]

I propose temporarily removing the TCK implementation and that we stop working on it until we arrive at a fairly stable agreement on the API and contract.

There is significant discussion going on in #19 and #37 that is changing the contract, and I expect further changes beyond these. The TCK impedes rapid iteration and confuses things until the contract is clearly defined.

Do we have agreement to delete what's currently there (and about to be obsolete) until we reach an agreement on contract?

[jbrisbin]

+1

[rkuhn]

+1

Before bringing it back we need to have at least two reference implementations of the new semantics so that we know that the TCK verifies the right thing.

[patriknw]

+1

[benjchristensen]

Based on agreement above I have submitted and will now merge a pull request to remove the TCK implementation but leave the folder structure in place.

[smaldini]

Will try to be candidate to the reference implementation :)

[ktoso]

removing it makes sense for now, +1 @benjchristensen :)