Skip to content

Fixes validation for uri-template format #819

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2021
Merged

Fixes validation for uri-template format #819

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2021

Conversation

nezhar
Copy link
Contributor

@nezhar nezhar commented Jun 25, 2021

Fixes the validation of uri-template using https://pypi.org/project/uri-template/

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #819 (a0c3aae) into main (010d5e1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #819   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.89%   95.89%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        2584     2584           
  Branches      298      299    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         2478     2478           
+ Misses         87       86    -1     
- Partials       19       20    +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jsonschema/_format.py 78.39% <100.00%> (+1.00%) ⬆️
jsonschema/tests/test_jsonschema_test_suite.py 87.50% <0.00%> (-5.00%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 010d5e1...a0c3aae. Read the comment docs.

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jun 27, 2021

Thanks!

@Julian Julian merged commit 0287da9 into python-jsonschema:main Jun 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants