Skip to content

update Exponential numpydoc #5491

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

chritter
Copy link
Contributor

@chritter chritter commented Feb 19, 2022

Addresses #5459.

Ensures pm.Exponential class descriptions and docstrings are conform with numpy doc validation.

Note we introduced restructured text syntax for a link (aeppl.logprob <https://github.com/aesara-devs/aeppl/blob/main/aeppl/logprob.py/>_.) which I would propose to adopt for all code. What do you think?

Depending on what your PR does, here are a few things you might want to address in the description:

#DataUmbrellaPyMCSprint

Working with @jmloyola.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5491 (6d88a59) into main (d150d55) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5491      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.61%   87.59%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          76       76              
  Lines       13698    13698              
==========================================
- Hits        12002    11999       -3     
- Misses       1696     1699       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pymc/distributions/continuous.py 97.23% <ø> (ø)
pymc/parallel_sampling.py 86.71% <0.00%> (-1.00%) ⬇️

@OriolAbril OriolAbril merged commit 54c9dfa into pymc-devs:main Mar 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants