Skip to content

Fix #2258 #2328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 19, 2017
Merged

Fix #2258 #2328

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 19, 2017

Conversation

junpenglao
Copy link
Member

@junpenglao junpenglao commented Jun 18, 2017

Related/same issue including: #2076, #2109

fix py2.7 float 32 test error
@junpenglao junpenglao requested a review from aseyboldt June 18, 2017 18:25
@junpenglao
Copy link
Member Author

junpenglao commented Jun 18, 2017

@aseyboldt I got something funny when testing, using the following code:

with pm.Model() as model:
    a = pm.Uniform('a', lower=0., upper=1.)
    pm.Uniform('b', lower=0., upper=a)
start = {'a': .7, 'b': .5}
pm.sampling._update_start_vals(start, model.test_point, model)
start

The value in start['b_interval__'] is incorrect (it changes every time the above is excuted), however if I do

    pm.Uniform('b', lower=0., upper=a-0.)

Then the value propagates correctly.
That's what I am currently doing in https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc3/pull/2328/files#diff-2d8e65f96de72b3dad37dd6025425149R140

a, b = draw_values([self.a-0., self.b-0.],
                                 point=point)

but I feel like I am missing something obvious here... Do you know if there is a better way?

@twiecki
Copy link
Member

twiecki commented Jun 19, 2017

This LGTM. @junpenglao is the above issue resolved after your recent commit?

@junpenglao
Copy link
Member Author

junpenglao commented Jun 19, 2017

Yes, there is no issue anymore, it just the implementation is not very pretty and potentially confusing. Maybe I should put a comment to explain why, and a warning not to delete the minus 0.

@twiecki
Copy link
Member

twiecki commented Jun 19, 2017

Good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants