Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Added DCAT mapping to FGDC and ISO metadata schemas #74

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mhogeweg
Copy link
Contributor

in the geospatial community FGDC and ISO are the most common metadata specifications used. this update includes a mapping between DCAT and these other metadata formats.

mhogeweg added 3 commits June 10, 2013 10:59
Many of the metadata found in federal and state catalogs is described using FGDC CSDGM. This update adds a mapping from DCAT to that common metadata schema.
international standards organization metadata for geospatial datasets (19115) and services (19119) with ISO19139 XML encoding.
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Contributor

Any reason for changing the tables above your additions?

@mhogeweg
Copy link
Contributor Author

they were showing up not formatted properly in my fork and when I just now looked on the main repo I saw the same behavior (
metadata_resources_tables
firefox 21).

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Contributor

To see the proper formatting, you need to follow the steps at https://github.com/project-open-data/project-open-data.github.io/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-locally

What GitHub renders in the repo is not what will be rendered at http://project-open-data.github.io/

@mhogeweg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mhogeweg
Copy link
Contributor Author

removing -{.table .table-striped} seemed to resolve the formatting when I was editing the file.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Contributor

Right, as I said, "what GitHub renders is not what will be rendered at http://project-open-data.github.io/" If you want to see the site like what's at http://project-open-data.github.io/, you need to follow the instructions linked to in my previous comment

latest release of open source geoportal server includes configurable support for DCAT to provide list of catalog content.
@mhogeweg
Copy link
Contributor Author

After work between @amilan17 and @eggwhites, this pull request may be closed. it has been replaced with #126.

@MarinaNitze
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in deference to #126 as requested. Thanks for all your work.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants