-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix for chromium renderer on linux systems (issue #2348) #3278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
nicolaskruchten
merged 3 commits into
plotly:master
from
c-chaitanya:chromium-browser-renderer-fix
Jul 21, 2021
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to use
if any(j in i for j in using)
here instead ofif i in using
here? I think the way it is now, you would get partial string matches, which might be confusing.Also, I think this will cause an index-out-of-bounds error if none of the browsers in the tuple are available. I don't recall what error is currently raised, but it would be nice to report something a little more informative (e.g. A
ValueError
that explains that none of the elements inusing
were found inlist(if any(j in i for j in using))
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes @jonmmease using
if i in using
makes more sense thanif any(j in i for j in using)
, will get that change done.Regarding the second point I could do something like
Let me know if the TypeError is easy to understand or any suggestions are welcome
ValueError for invalid names like
chromee
is already handled and throws and error as followsValueError: Invalid named renderer(s) received: ['chromee']
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think sticking with raising a
ValueError
makes sense here (to match to existing behavior). And I think you'll need to trap anIndexError
rather than aTypeError
to handle the case where no matches are found (this is the exception raised when you evaluate[][0]
).For the error message, I pictured including the actual list of supported browsers (the result of evaluating
list(webbrowser._browsers.keys())
) rather than "webbrowser._browsers.keys()
") rather than itself.Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jonmmease can you please help me out with the content to put in the value error. Does this content seem ok? Any suggestions are welcome.