Skip to content

sankey - fix issue with large padding #3143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 24, 2018
Merged

Conversation

antoinerg
Copy link
Contributor

@antoinerg antoinerg commented Oct 23, 2018

Closes #3140 !

If node.pad is too large and overridden during the rendering step, a Lib.warn call is made to let the user know.

@antoinerg antoinerg changed the title include updated d3-sankey sankey - fix issue with large padding Oct 23, 2018
package.json Outdated
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"3d-view": "^2.0.0",
"@plotly/d3-sankey": "^0.5.0",
"@plotly/d3-sankey": "git://github.com/plotly/d3-sankey.git#6f19390be0da4a81abf6f7f6cfdf5fc8dc73e583",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See the PR associated with the changes: plotly/d3-sankey#3

@antoinerg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original codepen in issue: https://codepen.io/rbakker/pen/gBjXde
Updated codepen pointing to this branch's plotly.js: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/EddvvK

@antoinerg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexcjohnson What are the next steps I should do before merging this PR? Should I publish @plotly/d3-sankey to NPM?

@etpinard
Copy link
Contributor

Should I publish @plotly/d3-sankey to NPM?

yep 🚀 and then update the package.json and package-lock.json in this PR.

@alexcjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

💃

@antoinerg antoinerg merged commit 36d9fb4 into master Oct 24, 2018
@antoinerg antoinerg deleted the 3140-sankey-fix-padding branch October 24, 2018 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug something broken
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants