Bug Fix for Issue #513 Fractional seconds lost in HDFStore for datetime indexes #834
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ime indexes" PyTables Time64Col is in fact a float64 alias so adding fractional seconds and using the correct dtype fixes this issue
…microsecond information. Also added simple test case for checking that fractional seconds are stored
…tetime comparison
|
Looks pretty good to me. Will let Wes look before I merge it in... |
|
indeed this looks fine. thanks a lot! |
wesm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2012
Close #513 Fractional seconds lost in HDFStore for datetime indexes
|
hi @lespaul, because you made a pull request from your master branch, you will want to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PyTables Time64Col is in fact a float64 alias so adding fractional seconds and using the correct dtype fixes this issue
#513